Illusion cannot equal
or be the same as mystery; nor, definitely, delusion.
Probably, it may be the difference between real and
unreal.
Illusion is mostly make-believe, and generally
explainable by most or at least some. Mystery, on the
other hand, may prevail symbiotically with ignorance. It
is not illusory, visually or audibly: it is just
something unexplainable to some, and easily understood by
others, and treated with scepticism by the rest.
Delusion, of course is being completely out of touch with
reality, and has no relation to either illusion or
mystery. Its closest ally is grandeur, gullibility, and
punishment or exploitation.
Illusion fascinates mankind in myriads of ways, mostly
visual.

(This illustration is from a Honda institutional ad, and
is named by them Endless Flow. Note: the water seems to
be flowing downward from one point; theoretically it
should end at another point, which would be the bottom,
but in the illustration it flows down continuously, as
well as climbs up continuously.)
Among man-made illusions, two-dimensional art forms are
the commonest, but most imaginative and creative. M.C. Escher, the Dutch artist, devoted a great deal
of his work to creating such masterpieces, from which the
above illustration has been directly derived. Here is the
original (it is a march of soldiers, climbing up and
down, up and down, endlessly):

Whether he himself was inspired by some Greek or ancient,
definitely western, artistic, philosophical, concepts, I
am at the moment not in a position to confirm. But he did
a great deal of work, inevitably, because it is
unavoidably obsessive. He has many followers, drawing
equal amount of fascination.
Let me join others who have wondered, or those who are
reading this blog, as to whether, given three-dimensional
reality, can this illusion of endless march, or endless
flow, or endless whatever, be physically produced, and
therefore converted to non-illusion and three-dimensional
shape conforming to existing laws of physics and science.
Of those who spend time on such speculation, most just
show fascination and confusion, and do not traverse to
convert the notion as illusory or physically possible.
Some believe that, given means, models can be created in
three-dimensions, with wood, steel, cardboard or other
materials, or even bricks, to establish the concept of
continuum.
I have not been casual on this matter, as I am
obsessively seeking clarity in every sound and every
sight. I have been able to prove that this illustration
belongs totally to the concept of visual illusion made
possible by elimination of third dimension, by drawing it
on a flat surface. To prove this, the clinching argument
that I have provided is that to produce this physically
would require the knowledge of the highest and the lowest
points in the illustration or drawing. If you observe the
picture, you will find that all points are either the
highest or the lowest, at the same time. It is therefore
not manufacturable into a real object, and therefore
scientifically unviable.
Einstein said 'God never plays dice.' Since, according to
me, there is no God, only human beings play dice.
Interestingly, they have no other choice because of the
caprice of life itself. It is fun, therefore, to defy
science and glimpse the unreal, and be pleasantly
fascinated by one of the most harmless aspects of man's
creative mind.
|